Most women consider a man who lies is a jerk. Confront her with her mistakes in choosing liars in the past, and she will usually defend herself by saying something like “but at least I got rid of him”. Unfortunately for her, she got rid of him after he got what he wanted (sex), and before she got what she wanted (commitment).

Lying turns every rule of relationships upside-down, because when a liar and an honest man want the same woman, the liar will always win. Nice guys lose out to liars because liars are not restricted by truth or ethics. A liar can invent anything he is lacking, while your honest man is stuck with the plain old truth.

Tell a woman who has been lied to that it’s her own doing for allowing it to happen, and she will say that you are blaming the victim. Complain to her about being lied to, and she will criticize you for being a victim. It's a no-win situation that puts the nice guys at a disadvantage. He has to be honest, put himself in a position to be lied to, and not complain if he winds up betrayed.

His lack of sexual experience works against him, because he usually won't know how to turn her on. She will then sense this flaw and dismiss him as a lover. Their conversations will stall because he doesn't know how to get where he wants to go and she has no desire to take him there. She then wants to repel him, and to do so she starts lying, because she correctly presumes that he can't handle the truth or turn her on in any way.

Of all the reasons women give for lying, the one that they feel justifies it the most but which is actually the worst reason, is to spare your feelings. It's not that they aren't trying to spare a man's feelings when they lie about why they reject him, or what they truly think about him, but instead the reason given is yet another lie in a lie!! Women do not lie to spare a man’s feelings; they lie to spare their own image. Does she really want to tell him that he's not tall enough, not enough of a jerk, not sexually skilled enough, that she'd be embarrassed to parade him around as her boyfriend, or anything along these lines? Of course not. Instead, she acts as if she finds nothing wrong with him, leaving his fatal flaw intact, and to add insult to the injury, they reassure him with platitudes.

When a woman lies to a man, she expects him to just get over it, tells him it was his fault for trusting her, leaving him to stew in his betrayal. When a jerk lies to a woman, he becomes public enemy #1. The double-standard is absurd. Nice men are too bothered by guilt to be caught in betrayal, and would actually feel bad about hurting someone to get laid. Jerks are not restricted by such silly things as conscience and can say or do anything they have to in order to get what they want (sex). The sexual revolution is to blame for a lot of this, because in the past, a man had to walk down the aisle before he get sex, and for him to win that honor (sex) from a woman, he had to have something going for him and although if he was a cheater, she would often stick out a loveless marriage for the sake of convenience, financial support, and reputation.

In the final analysis, women have to be held completely accountable for lying men because they are the ones who continue to tolerate lies even when they are presented with evidences. Hearing what they want to hear and believing what they want to believe is more important to them than whether or not what they are hearing is true. When asked specifically how they can tell their man is honest, a woman will begin by protesting that she just knows, and when it is pointed out to her that this is impossible to know, she will concede that she does not know for sure, but that at some point you just have to trust.